On May 3, 2001, Minnesota State Trooper Mark Lund intentionally drove
his squad car at 10 mph over an adult female turkey in front of the
Carver County courthouse near Minneapolis. On seeing she was still
alive, Mr. Lund spun her head around to break her neck. Lund has been
charged with animal cruelty and his case has been moved from Carver
County to Renville County to avoid conflict of interest issues.
Please read the letter below and based on the information, write a
polite short letter to the prosecuting attorney requesting that Mr.
Lund be prosecuted for cruelty to animals. Please do not fire off an
angry letter. Politely but firmly urge that state trooper Mark Lund
be prosecuted. Mr. Lund's arraignment hearing (at which he is
formally charged with committing a crime and asked how he pleads) is
set for June 4th. Write to:
|
Mr. David Torgelson
Renville County District Attorney
PO Box D
Olivia, MN 56277
Fax: 320-523-2667
(Tel: 320-523-2661)
Mr. Charlie Weaver, Commissioner
Department of Public Safety
North Central Life Tower
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 1000
St. Paul, MN 55101
|
May 22, 2001
Mr. David Torgelson
Renville County District Attorney
PO Box D
Olivia, MN 56277
Dear Mr. Torgelson:
I would like to thank you very much for talking with me yesterday in
response to my phone call to you concerning the prosecution of
Minnesota state trooper Mark Lund, who is charged with cruelty to
animals for running over a turkey with his squad car outside the
Carver County courthouse on May 3rd. I urge you to proceed with the
prosecution of Mr. Lund.
Please allow me to offer several considerations in this matter. Had
it been necessary to remove the turkey from the area, why didn't Mr.
Lund contact a licensed humane officer? In addition, there are three
animal advocacy organizations in Minneapolis that would have assisted
in finding this turkey a permanent home in a sanctuary such as ours:
Defenders of Farm Animals, Compassionate Action for Animals, and the
Animal Rights Coalition. Turkeys are easily captured when they are
roosting, and they generally roost in the same place every night.
Instead of using reason and forethought to solve a minor "animal
problem" humanely, Mr. Lund acted brutally. He inflicted a
particularly cruel and ugly death on a bird befriended by many
courthouse staff. In doing so, he also caused suffering to these
people, whose caring treatment probably encouraged this bird to feel
secure in the area.
Mr. Lund's method of disposing of this turkey was mean. He is
pleading "this is how we do things on the farm" and the "DNR made me
do it." These excuses are not only craven but absurd. Mr. Lund was
not on the farm. He was outside the Carver County courthouse, and
farmers do not normally dispose of farmed animals by running over
them. Even if the DNR did tell Mr. Lund to kill the turkey, did the
department tell Mr. Lund to drive over this defenseless bird with his
squad car? This trooper drove over a full-grown female bird weighing
at least fifteen pounds and then spun her neck around to break it. In
any case, he alone is responsible for his action.
The bird could have easily been trapped and relocated, if in fact she
was the nuisance Mr. Lund claims she was, which is disputed. If Mr.
Lund is not prosecuted for cruelty to animals, his crime will be
compounded and a message will go out to young people and others that
running over an animal you don't like and want to get rid
of-roadkill-is acceptable behavior. As an officer of the law, Mr.
Lund has a duty to society. His judgment in this case was so poor
that his fitness as a state trooper should be questioned.
As for the DNR telling Mr. Lund to kill this turkey because
(according to the Star Tribune, May 11, 2001), "it was a mixture of
wild and domestic turkey and would ruin the bloodline of wild
turkeys," this is nonsense. On such grounds, every "wild" turkey
should be destroyed because there isn't a turkey that doesn't include
both 'wild" and "domestic" genes. The history of random matings and
wanderings of wild and domestic turkeys is well known to anyone
familiar with the literature. The very idea that a single female
turkey in the middle of town had to be run down by a trooper in a
squad car in order to protect wild turkey genes is so silly the DNR
and Mr. Lund should be ashamed.
Please prosecute Mark Lund. In running over the turkey on May 3rd,
he set a vicious example for youth and for others. Not to prosecute
Mr. Lund is to legitimize road kill as a method of handling "animal
problems" and to sanction cruelty and violence in general. Please
don't send a message to high school students and others that a state
trooper does not have to show empathy or exercise judgment in
handling situations, but may resort to myopic violence and get away
with it. This is a green light to anyone with a cruel streak and to
anyone lacking self-control and compassion for their fellow
creatures-the kind of person Mr. Lund was in this situation. He
turned a simple matter into a horrible experience including death.
Wildlife biologists and the DNR know how to capture turkeys with
nets, tranquilizers, and other devises which they use to study, tag,
and relocate wild turkey populations and to manipulate the birds in
many different ways. There is no excuse for Mr. Lund's conduct. When
people who do what Mr. Lund did are not prosecuted, society is
demoralized and people lose confidence in the integrity and morality
of law enforcement. Innocent creatures have to suffer because the
"Mark Lunds" of the world are free from accountability. I hope you
will agree this is not the kind of law enforcement our society
desires or needs.
I respectfully offer United Poultry Concerns' assistance in the
prosecution and conviction of Mark Lund for cruelty to animals. We
can provide you with testimony from avian specialists, poultry
scientists, and veterinarians concerning the capacity of birds in
general and domestic fowl in particular to experience pain and
suffering comparable to the capacity of mammals including primates to
suffer pain and distress. Please don't hesitate to contact me at
757-678-7875 for further assistance and information.
Thank you again for your consideration of our views on this matter.
Sincerely,
Karen Davis, PhD
President
C: Mike Fahey, Carver County District Attorney
May 25, 2001
Mr. Charlie Weaver, Commissioner
Department of Public Safety
North Central Life Tower
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 1000
St. Paul, MN 55101
Dear Mr. Weaver:
I am writing to you in regard to the episode of May 3, 2001, in which
a Minnesota state trooper, Mark Lund, deliberately drove his patrol
car over an adult female turkey outside the Carver County courthouse.
I understand from the Star Tribune and from my telephone conversation
with Kevin Smith yesterday that the Department of Public Safety is
conducting an internal investigation of this episode.
I urge you to treat the conduct of Mr. Lund most seriously, including
the necessity of terminating his employment or at least suspending
him with counseling. Mr. Lund reportedly spent about a week watching
the bird he says was a threat to public safety prior to driving over
her, and thus he also knew that many Carver County courthouse staff
and other residents of Chaska treated this bird in a friendly way and
that their caring treatment probably encouraged the bird to feel
secure in the area, thus unwittingly putting her at the mercy of Mr.
Lund. An obvious question is, why didn't Mr. Lund contact a licensed
humane officer? I believe Mr. Lund claims to come from a farming
background. If so, he knows perfectly well that turkeys go to roost
at dusk and can thus be easily captured at any time during the night.
In his behavior, Mr. Lund showed a lack of judgment and a disposition
to cruelty and sadism. A person in uniform, carrying a gun, is in a
position to act out his or her personal pathologies under the guise
of law enforcement. Mr. Lund was not dealing with a criminal
brandishing a weapon or a potential gunman fleeing arrest. He was
dealing with a bird people had encouraged to stay in the area. If
necessary, this bird could simply have been captured, temporarily
penned, and found a home for, yet no effort to contact any animal
advocacy groups seems to have been made. At least four organizations
in the Minneapolis-St Paul area would have been able to help place
this turkey in a permanent sanctuary environment: Defenders of Farm
Animals, Compassionate Action for Animals, the Animal Rights
Coalition, and Midwest Farm Animal Rescue. All of these organizations
have national as well as local and regional Internet contacts.
In driving over this bird befriended by townspeople, Mr. Lund acted
cruelly not only towards the defenseless bird but towards the people
he knew cared about the bird. A psychologically healthy person does
not deliberately run over an animal. I speak in part as a former
juvenile probation officer in Baltimore City when I say that a person
who drives over animals, burns them alive, and does similar behavior
needs counseling and external controls and may well be incorrigible.
Current law enforcement literature recognizes the link between
socially dangerous individuals and animal abusers such as Mr. Lund.
Mr. Lund's only excuse for what he did is lack of sufficient
intelligence to enable him to perceive and weigh legitimate options
in a situation requiring mature judgment and handling. If Mr. Lund is
the disturbed individual that his conduct of May 3rd indicates, he
should be relieved of his employment, because he is too dangerous and
limited in cognitive scope to act appropriately. It is not turkeys
that we have to fear; it's the Mark Lunds and the moral atmosphere of
society and work that encourages and sustains them.
It is important that the Department of Public Safety's internal
investigation include these considerations in formulating policies
and protocols for officers and administrators henceforth. It would be
most valuable if the department would forge communication links with
the animal advocacy community to assist when possible in matters such
as the turkey episode. The Department of Public Safety and State
Patrol division need to incorporate a psychological screening and
counseling program that prioritizes ethical maturity and rational
judgment capabilities in its staff. The type of person who could
methodically drive 10 mph over a living creature in the middle of
town (or anywhere else) would thus be more likely to be eliminated
from the job pool and prevented from acting out his or her character
disorder under the self-protection of "law enforcement."
Thank you for your attention. I look forward to hearing from you as
soon as possible.
Sincerely,
Karen Davis, PhD
President
United Poultry Concerns. May 22, 2001
United Poultry Concerns, Inc.
PO Box 150
Machipongo, VA 23405-0150
757-678-7875
FAX: 757-678-5070
www.upc-online.org
(Action Alert - Minn. State Trooper Intenionally Ran Over a Turkey)
|