Winter 2006 Poultry Press

Book Review
The Way We Eat: Why Our Food Choices Matter

By Peter Singer & Jim Mason
Rodale, 2006

Review by Karen Davis, PhD, President of United Poultry Concerns

In 1980, attorney Jim Mason and philosopher Peter Singer coauthored Animal Factories. Updated in 1990, the book documents the destructive effects of factory farming on the family farm, the environment, human health and the lives of animals raised for food. In The Way We Eat, Mason and Singer team up to show how we can, and why we should, act “to reduce the harm” that our food choices inflict on animals, the environment, and other people.

The book is presented as the authors’ journey into the homes of three American families whose food choice habits and dietary ethics range from standard convenient (Tyson, Wal-Mart, fast-food) to semi-conscientious (“humanely-produced” meat, dairy and eggs) to ethical vegan (healthful, compassionate, animal-free food). They chat with pig farmers, egg producers, commercial crabbers, and others in the food industry to give readers a better idea of the origin and true cost of foods in terms of dollars and cents, animal suffering, environmental damage and human health.

They show us a free-range pig farm versus an industrialized pig farm, and visit organic and cage-free hen operations where the hens may or may not (“not” if the eggs are labeled “cage-free”) spend some time outdoors, and where they are “beak trimmed” to offset the effects of boredom and crowding and are ultimately trucked to slaughter, live markets or elsewhere after a year or two. The authors explain that “it is not possible to produce laying hens without also producing male chickens, and since these male chicks have no commercial value, they are invariably killed as soon as they have been sexed. The laying hens themselves will be killed once their rate of laying declines. In the dairy industry much the same thing happens – the male calves are killed immediately or raised for veal, and the cows are turned into hamburger long before normal old age. So rejecting the killing of animals points to a vegan, rather than a vegetarian, diet” (p. 279).  

Scientific evidence that fish feel pain is importantly presented, and in “Enter the Chicken Shed,” the authors powerfully describe the brutality of the “broiler” chicken industry (which produces the 6-week-old baby chickens consumers know only as “chicken”) and the unspeakable pain and suffering these birds endure from birth to death. In addition to “increased mortality due to heart attacks,” lameness and other manmade miseries, chickens are intentionally kept alive during the slaughter process so their hearts will continue to beat and pump out blood after their throats are cut, which is why hundreds of millions of chickens– one in every three, according to former Tyson chicken slaughterhouse worker Virgil Butler – are scalded alive at the slaughter plant. Professor John Webster of the University of Bristol’s School of Veterinary Medicine is quoted as saying that industrialized chicken production is “in both magnitude and severity, the single most severe, systematic example of man’s inhumanity to another sentient animal” (p. 24).
     
A Long Way from Animal Liberation

When the book was in draft I was asked to read and offer suggestions on the chicken and egg chapters, which I gladly did with improved results, for while The Way We Eat conveys much of the cruelty of industrialized chicken and egg production, the authors empathize poorly with birds and do things like crudely referring to artificially-inseminated turkeys’ genitals as their “assholes,”* and demeaning hens’ need to dustbathe by implying that dustbathing is some sort of poorly understood female type of behavior, when in fact dustbathing is well known by scientists and others, including the authors (I gave them the information, which they ignored), to be chickens’ way of maintaining healthy skin and plumage. So essential is dustbathing to their wellbeing that battery hens try to dustbathe on the wire floor of their cages.   

In an interview with the online publication Slate, Singer revealingly said that he thinks the circle of compassionate treatment of nonhuman animals “gets gray when you get beyond mammals,” and while criticizing treating nonhuman animals as “things [‘its’],” he himself refers to chickens throughout as “its” and suggests that engineering wingless chickens to fit more of them into tight spaces would probably be “an improvement.” (Picture the experimental research being done to accomplish this goal as well as the engineering of insentient “brainless chickens” which Singer also considers “an ethical improvement on the present system.”)

Moreover, despite the overwhelming evidence that pre-slaughter electrical “stunning” of turkeys, chickens and other birds tortures them horribly, and though a major campaign by farmed-animal advocates and welfare scientists is underway to get rid of electrical “stunning” because of its excruciating cruelty, Singer blandly told Slate that “spent” hens can be killed “humanely,” if you “make sure that every hen is individually stunned with an electric shock and then killed by having its [sic] throat cut” (Slate, May 8, 2006).     

The Way We Eat contains valuable information, ideas, and recommendations; however, the authors’ characterization of less industrialized, more traditional types of animal farms and farming practices as “humane” and “animal friendly” does not hold up. One can only wonder if their skuzzy applause would be given if instead of chickens, cows, pigs, turkeys and fish, the animals were companion animals or humans.

The book is thus a long way from the animal liberation and antispeciesist philosophy associated with Peter Singer, and from Jim Mason’s earlier book An Unnatural Order which criticizes traditional animal farming as the root of social injustice and human domination in the world. Still, the authors make important points. They argue for example that “Personal purity isn’t really the issue. Not supporting animal abuse – and persuading others not to support it – is. Giving people the impression that it is virtually impossible to be vegan doesn’t help animals at all” (p. 283).

And for those who ethically reject meat from large-scale industrial operations but are not vegetarians, a big problem the authors point out is that “When conscientious omnivores eat meat, their dietary choices are less evident. On the plate, ham from a pig who led a happy life looks very much like ham from a factory-farmed pig. Thus the eating habits of the conscientious omnivore are likely to reinforce the common view that animals are things for us to use and unlikely to influence others to reconsider what they eat” (pp. 258-58).

The Way We Eat concludes with an annotated selection of resources for more information about the issues raised in the book. Strongly recommended under Animal Agriculture are my books Prisoned Chickens, Poisoned Eggs: An Inside Look at the Modern Poultry Industry and More Than a Meal: The Turkey in History, Myth, Ritual, and Reality. These books available from UPC.
-----------------------------------------
*The book’s section, “A Day in the Life of a Turkey Inseminator,” pp. 28-29, first appeared as the cover article, “In the Turkey Breeding Factory” by “Frank Observer” (Jim Mason), in the Fall-Winter issue of Poultry Press, Vol. 4, No. 4. It’s reprinted in my book More Than a Meal: The Turkey in History, Myth, Ritual, and Reality, pp. 84-85. The desensitizing language was not in the original.



Patty Mark Addresses UPC Conference

A strong spirit is the most powerful tool an animal activist can have, and integrity is the rock on which the animal movement must stand. The spirit was saddened and the rock was wobbling, however, when I read several reviews of Peter Singer’s new book co-authored with Jim Mason, The Way We Eat: Why Our Food Choices Matter.

Yes, Peter Singer is an articulate writer and known globally as the “father” of the animal movement, and without a doubt this book will open some eyes and close mouths to certain types of food. However, Singer is letting many animals down and turning a blind eye to their brutal slaughter, rubber-stamping their death by cautiously trying to keep the status quo happy.

It’s much easier for Singer and more palatable for the public that he advise them on what meat is the most humane to eat, whether one should eat farmed fish or those wild-caught, or casually describe how to be a “conscientious carnivore.” Just make sure the animals you eat aren’t factory farmed but are instead humanely raised.

Singer’s recent media interviews seem to place abolitionists in the box marked “fanatic.” I don’t believe people who oppose abattoirs and the institutionalized and systematic killing of others are fanatics. Sadly, it’s become clear that Singer is “Uncle Peter” rather than father to the animals. During his interviews promoting his new book, Singer failed to take the excellent opportunity to promote in any way a vegan lifestyle as the true, ethical choice for less suffering, terror and destruction in the world. As Gary Francione, Professor of Law at Rutgers, clearly and simply states: “Veganism is the one truly abolitionist goal that we can all achieve – and we can achieve it immediately, starting with our next meal.”

This is an alarm bell appealing to compassionate people and animal activists everywhere to step back and look at the bigger picture. If we substitute humans for animals in Singer’s reasoning, the inherent speciesism of his viewpoint becomes clear. Would we argue that fewer beatings and a longer chain would make slavery acceptable or ethical? Not any more than we should contemplate “kindly” cutting the throat of an innocent animal to feed our face.

While Singer would argue that his moderate approach provides a stepping stone for the average consumer who is frightened by the word vegan, it merely serves to perpetuate the false belief that animals are our property to use as we like. It’s our job to lead the way to abolition.

From “Myth: Killing Can Be Kind,” by Patty Mark in the August 2006 issue of Satya magazine (www.satyamag.com). Patty is president of the Australian animal advocacy organization Animal Liberation Victoria (www.alv.org.au) and pioneer of the global Open Rescue movement, which she brought to the US on June 26-27, 1999, when she spoke at United Poultry Concerns’ historic Forum on Direct Action for Animals in Machipongo, Virginia. For more information about this revolutionary Forum and Patty’s presentation, read “Open Rescues: Putting a Face on the Rescuers and on the Rescued” by Karen Davis, in Terrorists or Freedom Fighters: Reflections on the Liberation of Animals, ed. by Steven Best, PhD & Anthony J. Nocella II & published by Lantern Books (800-856-8664. www.lanternbooks.com).

Winter 2006 Poultry Press